What was the challenge?
"Our client had a strong preference for an app which utilized geolocation features to view travel itineraries sourced from other parents."
Our design process started by taking a look at BBV's current platform to understand the product better and get a sense of the design values.
Something that my group wondered throughout the early process was whether our client was attached to the idea of building a geolocation app, given that we did not have enough data on whether it would actually address the issue of information accessiblity on the main Facebook group.
We wanted to have all options on the table, in case a different format would be a better fit for the usersâ needs.
"The website had categories of content that were not labeled and organized intuitively, and had many groups which could be combined, separated or condensed."
What was the user perspective?
- How does BBV offer value to its users?
- What unexpected issues did the users experience?
- What were some key opportunities for BBV?
- Our users wanted to get streamlined information on traveling that was provided by a trusted source. This came in the form of chatting with other parents who had previous experience or more personal ways, such as seeing user-generated content such as pictures of families while traveling.
- A major theme we would learn about was that the website had a high bounce rate. Many users did not use it because they found it was hard to navigate and it did not provide much value over the Facebook community. Some users didnât even know about it the website.
- It came to our attention that a centralized source of information needed to exist outside the Facebook group, which had become bogged down by repeated questions. According to the users, the Facebook community should be a private place to share personal travel stories and ask personalized questions about destinations.
Problem statement
"Uncertain and curious parents need community-sourced guides composed from the experiences of other parents to minimize unexpected problems during travel."
"Before sketching lo-fi mockups, my team went through several exercises and thought experiments to determine how we should best tackle the problem with the limited time we had."
What was the design approach?
We started asking questions about how we could create a concept that would incorporate features that best assisted in solving the problem statement.
- What could we do to address information accessibility concerns?
- What could we do to maximize engagement and provide a personal connection?
We decided to address the clientâs original desire for a mobile app featuring geolocation.
A redesign of the current website to modernize the UX design and Information Architecture.
The reason we made the second concept a website redesign was because the current website was not up to the users' standards as a place to get information and it would make more sense logistically for the company to rework what they had in place than to scrap it for an app.
A third concept utilizing a message board similar to Reddit was ideated but dropped because it was deemed as not providing much more value than what was already in place.
We spoke with users again, this time testing our concepts as well as the current website content to draw a contrast in our results.
To supplement our tests with a larger dataset, we also surveyed the BBV online community on which concept they preferred. Â
Our results showed that users visually liked the mobile map concept better than the website redesign.
"Many of the same interviewees who liked the mobile app better also stated that there was a need for a website to consolidate information."
What was our MVP's design?
Content formatted as tiles for easier visualization.
Pros & cons as well as ratings placed in visible location.
Accordion format used to neatly organize content.
What did we want to test?
- Was our solution making information clear and accessible to users?
- How closely did the organization and flow of the site match the usersâ mental models?
- Did our solution provide relevant and sufficient information for users?
- Is the right information highlighted, or do they have to dig for what they really want?
- Did users think our solution allowed them to prepare for their upcoming trips?
Task 1
Task 2
Task 3
What were the results?
The results for the usability came in and were positive overall. Our tested users said that they felt the information they were looking for in our prototype was intuitive to reach. They remarked that the ability for members to leave and read reviews on the website made it feel like they were in a place that they could trust to help them out.
100%
4.6/5
4.4/5
Some common suggestions from users were easy to implement as iterations to our design. This came in the form of revising age group classification, adding a buy button directly to the website and adding âWhat to Bringâ to destinations.
Other suggestions were documented but would require further testing to properly implement. These included greater platform personalization, standardizing content and better utilizing geolocation for engaging family activities.
Conclusion
With our mobile website redesign, we created a platform that was easy for users to navigate through both a visual map and text-based formats, provided the information they wanted to learn about their travel needs, and still provided elements of personalization as well as user engagement.
In our final hand-off for reference, we included an executive summary to define what each deliverable was for. Because we deviated from the original idea of an app, we needed to provide documentation in detailing project decisions, such as why we chose to create a responsive website and how the client can refer to each deliverable our hand-off.
This project helped me grow as a designer most in terms of gauging what users prioritized in a product, and how to prioritize features in an MVP. It helped solidify the notion that the first solution is not always the best solution. Although we had a solid grasp of who we were making the product for, it took three rounds of user interviews and testing to determine our MVP. The experience made me grow as a professional, as I was able to juggle the clients' requirements in a diplomatic way.
Our client came out of this partnership happy because we were able to offer alternatives to their original plan that users loved. They implemented many of the IA and visual designs we suggested and internal testing 6 months after showed a large increase in website engagement and steady decline in repeated questions on the community page.